Archive

Archive for December, 2009

New PSA Nature Rules – Some Further Clarification From NECCC

December 3rd, 2009

Included in the NECCC Competition Results was some more information on the revised PSA Nature rules (posted here on the blog 11/4/09), which I thought would be a good idea to pass along.  A great article on working with the PSA Nature (pre-change) and Wildlife definitions can be found on our main web site.

New Nature Rules

Many of you may have heard that the PSA Nature Division updated their definition of nature at the convention held in West Yellowstone recently. The new definition is as follows:

“Nature photography is restricted to the use of the photographic process to depict observations from all branches of natural history, except anthropology and archeology, in such a fashion that a well informed person will be able to identify the subject material and to certify as to its honest presentation. The story telling value of a photograph must be weighed more than the pictorial quality while maintaining a high technical quality. Human elements shall not be present, except where those human elements enhance the nature story. The presence of scientific bands, scientific tags or radio collars on wild animals is permissible. Photographs of artificially produced hybrid plants or animals, mounted specimens, or obviously set arrangements, are ineligible, as is any form of manipulation that alters the truth of the photographic statement. No techniques that add to, relocate, replace, or remove pictorial elements except by cropping are permitted. Techniques that enhance the presentation of the photograph without changing the nature story or the pictorial content are permitted. All adjustments must appear natural.”

This new definition means we have new freedom to use digital techniques to enhance our nature images. In two recent communications Dan Charbonnet added the following clarifying comments which help to understand the new rules:

“For most people, this means that the various HDR techniques are now allowed and it means blurring the background is now allowed, provided the results look natural.”

“All images must be considered “Digital Realism, ” where a photographer may perform any enhancements and modifications that improve the presentation of the image to make it more closely represent the original scene photographed but that does not change the truth of the original nature story. Cropping and horizontal flipping (equivalent to reversing a slide) are acceptable modifications. Removing spots due to dust on your sensors is allowed. Removing rounded slide mount corners on scanned images is allowed. Adding elements to your images, removing pictorial elements from your image other than by cropping, combining separate images or rearranging and/or cloning and/or copying elements in your image are not still acceptable and can lead to disqualification of your image in the competition. Since HDR techniques and Helicon Focus techniques are techniques that enhance the presentation without changing the pictorial content, they are now considered allowable techniques. Please note that all adjustments must still look natural. Just because a technique is legitimate does not guarantee the image it was used on will get a good score.”

Effective with the Winter competition this new definition will apply to the NECCC Nature Interclub. Keep in mind that we do not require images to meet the requirements of the PSA definition of Wildlife. Zoo shots and game farm shots are eligible provided the artificial habitat is not apparent in the image.

The final determination of what constitutes nature rests with our judges. The judges are instructed to give a low score to photographs that do not meet the definition. The directors do not determine if a nature image is legitimate.

If you have additional questions about this new definition we will try to answer them or attempt to get answers from persons who know more about the subject.

Rick News ,

NECCC – Fall 2009 Electronic Interclub Competition Results

December 3rd, 2009

Results of the Fall 2009 Electronic Interclub Competition were recently received from Bill Barnett and our very own Cindy Gosselin, Co-Chairmen of the Competition.  From the report:

The Fall competition was held on November 18, 2009, hosted by Boston West Photographic Society. The competition was directed by Harrison Ball assisted by Michael Roman, Steve Iadarola, and Dana Lane. Thirty-nine clubs participated in the Pictorial section (14 from Class A and 25 from Class B) and thirty-four clubs participated in the Nature section (12 from Class A and 22 from Class B). The judges for the competition were Dan Charbonnet, Sarah Musumeci, and Ian Dicker. Dan Charbonnet belongs to Stony Brook Camera Club as well as Greater Lynn. Ian Dicker belongs to Boston West Photographic Society (and notes that due to his job workload coupled with his wife’s health and recuperation from surgery, he is not familiar with the club’s material). Sarah Musumeci is a member of the Merrimack Valley Camera Club.

Charter Oak finished a respectable tie for 4th in the Class A Pictorial competition and tie for 5th in Nature.

Val Nanovsky, once again, took home an Honorable Mention award for his Engulfed in Silence in the Pictorial judging.  Congratulations Val!  For more information on this image and all of Val’s work, check out his blog at www.valdorama.com/blog.

Rick General

CAP Invitational Salon – Results

December 2nd, 2009

Judging for the Connecticut Association of Photographers 27th Annual Invitational Salon competition was held last month in Meriden, CT. and Charter Oak did very well finishing 1st overall in the Print competition and 2nd overall in Digital!

Individual Awards of Merit went to Austin Carey in Prints for Sunrise at Schwabachers, Cindy Gosselin in Digital for Egrets Nesting in Pepper Bushes, and Val Nanovsky in Digital for Engulfed in Silence. Congratulations to all!

Click on image for larger view.

Rick General