2010-2011 Competition Rules
The competition rules for the 2010-2011 season have been approved by the Board. To get your copy, visit the Charter Oak web site at www.charteroakphoto.com and click on the link for the rules on the home page.
The competition rules for the 2010-2011 season have been approved by the Board. To get your copy, visit the Charter Oak web site at www.charteroakphoto.com and click on the link for the rules on the home page.
Included in the NECCC Competition Results was some more information on the revised PSA Nature rules (posted here on the blog 11/4/09), which I thought would be a good idea to pass along. A great article on working with the PSA Nature (pre-change) and Wildlife definitions can be found on our main web site.
New Nature Rules
Many of you may have heard that the PSA Nature Division updated their definition of nature at the convention held in West Yellowstone recently. The new definition is as follows:
“Nature photography is restricted to the use of the photographic process to depict observations from all branches of natural history, except anthropology and archeology, in such a fashion that a well informed person will be able to identify the subject material and to certify as to its honest presentation. The story telling value of a photograph must be weighed more than the pictorial quality while maintaining a high technical quality. Human elements shall not be present, except where those human elements enhance the nature story. The presence of scientific bands, scientific tags or radio collars on wild animals is permissible. Photographs of artificially produced hybrid plants or animals, mounted specimens, or obviously set arrangements, are ineligible, as is any form of manipulation that alters the truth of the photographic statement. No techniques that add to, relocate, replace, or remove pictorial elements except by cropping are permitted. Techniques that enhance the presentation of the photograph without changing the nature story or the pictorial content are permitted. All adjustments must appear natural.”
This new definition means we have new freedom to use digital techniques to enhance our nature images. In two recent communications Dan Charbonnet added the following clarifying comments which help to understand the new rules:
“For most people, this means that the various HDR techniques are now allowed and it means blurring the background is now allowed, provided the results look natural.”
“All images must be considered “Digital Realism, ” where a photographer may perform any enhancements and modifications that improve the presentation of the image to make it more closely represent the original scene photographed but that does not change the truth of the original nature story. Cropping and horizontal flipping (equivalent to reversing a slide) are acceptable modifications. Removing spots due to dust on your sensors is allowed. Removing rounded slide mount corners on scanned images is allowed. Adding elements to your images, removing pictorial elements from your image other than by cropping, combining separate images or rearranging and/or cloning and/or copying elements in your image are not still acceptable and can lead to disqualification of your image in the competition. Since HDR techniques and Helicon Focus techniques are techniques that enhance the presentation without changing the pictorial content, they are now considered allowable techniques. Please note that all adjustments must still look natural. Just because a technique is legitimate does not guarantee the image it was used on will get a good score.”
Effective with the Winter competition this new definition will apply to the NECCC Nature Interclub. Keep in mind that we do not require images to meet the requirements of the PSA definition of Wildlife. Zoo shots and game farm shots are eligible provided the artificial habitat is not apparent in the image.
The final determination of what constitutes nature rests with our judges. The judges are instructed to give a low score to photographs that do not meet the definition. The directors do not determine if a nature image is legitimate.
If you have additional questions about this new definition we will try to answer them or attempt to get answers from persons who know more about the subject.
In case you didn’t notice it in the rules, the Altered category has been changed to the Creative category. Even if you did spot the change you might be a bit confused as some of us have continued to use Altered when we mean Creative. In fact, it wasn’t until recently that I noticed that I hadn’t changed it in the upload software. Sometimes, change just takes a little while to sink in.
Why the change you might ask? Quite honestly, I can’t remember all the reasons discussed, but I do know that the judges at last year’s competitions seemed to get hung up trying to figure out what was altered in an image and it just caused confusion all around. The rules for Traditional images have been relaxed a bit so that images with some minor corrections that might have wound up in Altered last year now stay in Traditional leaving the Creative category open for the images it was really intended for. From the rules:
If you have any questions about this change, don’t hesitate to ask. And, for those of you that use the upload software, please run the update program so you pick up a new license file with the corrected category name.
Just a reminder on submitting images for competition – as outlined in the 2008-2009 COPS Competition Rules, once an image has been submitted in competition in a particular format, it can never be submitted in that format again. The image can be submitted in a subsequent competition year in a different format, although members are encouraged to submit new work. So, an image previously entered this year in Digital can be entered in Print in the 2009-2010 season.
As always, if you have any questions regarding the rules, please contact any member of the Rules Committee or the Board.